A Perfect Storm? No, not yet

Ferg Slade, the Policy and Campaigns Officer at Nottingham CVS, guest blogs for the Back Britain’s Charities campaign…

Here at Nottingham CVS we wanted to know if all the rumours we were hearing of fewer staff, reduced funding and increased demand was actually what was happening on the ground. So in spring we undertook our first State of the Sector survey to assess how Nottingham’s voluntary sector was faring.

Our picture was similar to other surveys carried out in London, Newcastle and Manchester, finding that there is a picture of fewer staff, reduced funding and increased demand for services. Some are calling this a perfect storm – but we disagree.

The landscape for charities is a bleak one, no question. But we feel it is worse for service users who rely on the work the voluntary sector does to give them stability, happiness and equality.

We asked a question we hadn’t seen elsewhere – if you close, who will pick up your service users? Who’ll look after them?

The resounding answer was no-one.

To us,  that is the perfect storm. Because if the voluntary sector isn’t supporting vulnerable people, then it’s them who suffer most. Many people need long term support, and we must ensure that provision is in place so that vulnerable people – be they homeless, victims of domestic violence, drug users or alcoholics – have somewhere to turn in their time of need.

This has become particularly pertinent in Nottingham this week with the sad closure of Roshni, a group who supported Asian women experiencing domestic violence. Niche, yes. But who would deny its importance?

Our survey was done to give charities a campaigning tool. We have been delighted that local MPs have been championing it too, and using it to try and alert Government to the difficulties facing charities across the country.  Just this week Lillian Greenwood MP cited the research during Cabinet Office questions in the House of Commons. We need to make sure that the Government recognises the need for charities, and that vulnerable people are not forced to suffer.

We’re supporting the Back Britain’s Charities campaign (www.backbritainscharities.org) by the Charities Aid Foundation and NCVO because we see the amazing work the voluntary sector does every day. But it does not come for free. If you invest in it, it’s good value for money, which is why local and national government rightly praise it. Now we need to protect it.

The voluntary sector is often seen luxury not an investment, and a change in that rhetoric might steer us away from the perfect storm. And given the current climate, that storm isn’t far away.

 

If you would like to make a wider audience aware of your experiences in the charity sector then guest blog for the Back Britain’s Charities campaign! Get in touch for further details.


Shadow Minister for Civil Society Back Britain’s Charities

Gareth Thomas MP, Shadow Minister for Civil Society and Member of Parliament for Harrow West has added his voice to the Back Britain’s Charities campaign, and called on others to follow his lead and stand up for Britain’s charities.

This follows hot on the heels of an exciting week for the campaign in Parliament, which has now been the subject of debate in both the House of Commons and the House of Lords, showing that the campaign is cutting through to Parliamentarians, many of whom are concerned about the plight of Britain’s charities.

Mr Thomas, first elected in 1997 and a former Minister for both International Development and Business, became Shadow Minister for Civil Society in October 2011. Since moving into his new role he has shown a strong passion for the charitable sector, an interest in the broad array of policies issues across the sector, and a commitment to supporting charities.

Explaining his decision to back the campaign, Mr Thomas said:

“I’m supporting the Back Britain’s Charities campaign and calling on everyone to do their bit and stand up for charities. A vibrant charitable sector strengthens communities across Britain, and many of the most vulnerable people in our society depend on the services that charities provide. It is extremely worrying that some of these services are now under threat.

“The Back Britain’s Charities campaign is playing a vital role in raising awareness of the challenges facing charities during this difficult economic time, and giving those charities who are struggling a voice. I applaud the work of CAF and NCVO and I am proud to support this campaign – I urge others to do the same and Back Britain’s Charities.”

Gaining the support of MPs is invaluable to the campaign, as they play a major role in shaping topics of debate, and are leaders in their constituencies. The support of Gareth Thomas MP is particularly important given his portfolio, as he is responsible for shaping the Labour Party’s policies and strategic direction for the civil society.

Knowing that he empathises with the situation that many charities find themselves in as a result of the broader economic climate is extremely heartening. Importantly, combined with the backing that the campaign has also received from Chris White MP (Conservative, Warwick and Leamington) and others, this means that the campaign is attracting support from high-profile third sector voices from both sides of Parliament.

But we need more MPs to stand up for charities.

Why not ask your MP whether they are willing to sign up to the Back Britain’s Charities campaign? You can find out who your MP is by putting your postcode in here and then send them a quick email explaining why you are backing the campaign, and why you think they should too – let them know how they can help.

Remember your MP is your representative – they will want to hear from you!

 As the calendar turns to 2013 there will by new and increased pressures facing charities, and it is essential that we build on the campaign’s momentum to continue to highlight the plight of charities across the country. Make sure you are doing your bit, and sign up and Back Britain’s Charities!


More Parliamentarians Back Britain’s Charities

Blog post by Fiona McEvoy, Campaigns Manager at CAF

After some great hat-tips from parliamentarians last week, the campaign and associated research has continued to make it’s mark within the walls of Westminster Palace…

Yesterday the Small Charitable Donations Bill was passed by Royal Assent after a debate in the Lords, during which both Baroness Barker and Baroness Hayter made further mention of the UK Giving report that launched our Back Britain’s Charities campaign last month. 

Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town said of the current circumstances:

“The recent fall-off in charitable income-20% according to one recent report-particularly affects small and medium-sized charities, and this Bill is perhaps therefore even more important than it was when it started its life. Indeed, we understand that some one in six charities is threatened with closure and up to 40% worry that they may have to close if the economic situation fails to improve.”

Later, Baroness Barker said of the reports we’ve put out as part of the campaign:

“Having seen them, we all know that the outlook for charities, like that for other sectors, is going to be really bleak for the next few years. It is predicted that charities may lose up to £1 billion from a total income.”

It was gratifying to hear peers raising our concerns about the Bill as the Back Britain’s Charities campaign has been heavily involving in briefing and engaging in order to secure the best results for the smaller charities who stand to benefit.

And today – once again – there was further mention of the research at Cabinet Office questions, with Andy McDonald MP speaking about the £300m deficit faced by small and medium charities (figures released by CAF as part of the campaign) and Gareth Thomas, the Shadow Minister for Civil Society, also cited CAF’s survey of senior charity workers.

Furthermore, at Topical Questions this afternoon, which followed on from Cabinet Questions, Lillian Greenwood MP  quoted interesting statistics from a recent release from Nottingham Community and Voluntary Service highlighting the plight of local charities –

“Nottingham community and voluntary service’s state of the sector report found that although demand for services is increasing, 69% of voluntary groups are facing reduced income, 52% have been forced to cut staff this year, 76% say they may have to close a service and 36% may close altogether”.

Added to this, we’ve also had further support from respected parliamentarians, with Lord Gus O’Donnell, Baroness Barker, Lord David Steel and Frank Field MP all signing up and pledging their support for the campaign today!

If you would like to play your part alongside the hundreds of charities and individuals who have already signed up, then just click here – it only takes seconds to show that you’re prepared to Back Britain’s Charities.


Backing Britain’s Charities in Parliament

Blog post by Steve Clapperton, Campaigns Manager at CAF

Following the significant media coverage of the Back Britain’s Charities campaign earlier in the week, the joint CAF (Charities Aid Foundation) and NCVO (National Council for Voluntary Organisations) campaign made it to Parliament on Wednesday 12th December, with statistics and briefings used by the campaign forming the basis of much of the day’s debate in the House of Lords.

The UK Giving 2012 report, a key part of the Back Britain’s Charities campaign, found itself the subject of Parliamentary scrutiny, as Baroness Pitkeathley used House of Lords question time to press the Government on their support for the charitable sector, and urged the Government to take action to encourage giving.

Baroness Pitkeathley raised statistics from CAF’s survey of senior charity workers published this weekend, and argued that the threat facing charities raised questions about the Government’s vision for the voluntary sector. In response for the Government, Lord Wallace of Saltaire told the House that he had looked at the research in “some detail,” and that he found the contents to be “worrying.”

Baroness Barker then asked the Government to reform Gift Aid – one of the 5 asks of the Back Britain’s Charities campaign – pointing out that a universal declaration of gift aid would make online giving much more beneficial to charities than it is now. Lord Wallace of Saltaire, speaking for the Government, told the House that “I strongly agree with the noble Baroness.”

Both responses from the Government show that they are aware of the research underpinning the campaign, and that decision makers at the highest level are aware of the pressures on them to act to support charities.

That wasn’t the end of the campaign’s Parliamentary activity for the day. A later debate in the House of Lords on the role of the voluntary sector in providing public services was dominated by references to the data published on Sunday, showing that the media coverage received over the weekend hit home with Parliamentarians.

In the chamber former Chief Secretary to the Treasury Lord Boateng highlighted the problems facing charities as detailed in the 2012 UK Giving Report, telling Peers that the financial situation many charities find themselves in “undoubtedly reflects the period of austerity and the challenging economic times in which we live.” Lord Boateng went on to directly reference the senior charity workers survey, using the figures to draw attention to the turbulent economic climate facing the third sector.

As the campaign has demonstrated, many charities are being hit with a triple whammy; donations are down, central and local government are making cuts, and the demand for the services charities provide is increasing. This dilemma was eloquently explained by Lord Adebowale, who told the chamber that “not-for-profit organisations are having to think long and hard about how they can remain sustainable […] while maintaining the quality of services and support that they can provide to the people that need it.”

It is clear from the tone and content of the debates that there is a growing awareness of the challenges facing charities, and that many Members of the House of Lords are determined to support the third sector.

We need to capitalise on this momentum to ensure that the threat facing charities remains at the forefront of political debate in the New Year – and we need your help.

Sign up to the campaign here, and find out what you can do to Back Britain’s Charities.


Giving it large: million pound donors

Blog post by Rhodri Davies, Policy Manager at CAF

The Annual Coutts Million Pound Donors report, compiled by Dr Beth Breeze of the University of Kent, was released today. The headline finding is that there has been an increase in the number of donations of £1 million pounds or more, but the overall value of these “million pound donations” is down, from £1.3bn in the 2011 report to £1.2bn this year. The number of different donors giving such donations has also risen: 130 separate “million pound donors” were identified in this year’s report, a marked increase on the 73 identified last year.

The analysis of these figures suggests there are reasons to be both encouraged and concerned: there are more million pound donors, but they are giving less on average than was the case in the past. The cause for concern is that at the same time as regular charitable donations are down (as shown by this year’s UK Giving), the mega-donations that in many years drag up the overall total are down as well. This goes to show what a difficult situation charities are facing at the moment in terms of fundraising, both from the general public and from the super-rich. The encouraging thing, with an eye on the longer term, is that there appear to be more people who have ‘caught the philanthropy bug’, and the hope is that they will continue this generosity through to better economic times when the amounts they are able to give will hopefully rise.

There are a couple of things it is worth noting about this report. The first is that the total value of million pound donations includes not just donations from individuals, but donations from corporates and ‘professional foundations’ (those which are no longer controlled by the settlor or their family). It is important to bear this in mind when relating the figures to those in UK Giving, as the figures in the latter relate solely to individual charitable donations.

The other thing that is worth taking into account is the huge difference in the profile of causes that million pound donations go to, compared to mainstream donations. The top three causes identified in the Million Pound Donor report (excluding foundations) were higher education, arts & culture and international development. By contrast, the three most popular charitable causes identified by UK Giving were medical research, hospital and children. This suggests that even if million pound donations had remained flat this year, this would more than likely not have benefited most of the charities bearing the brunt of the 20 per cent real terms drop in donations reported in UK Giving, as they are not the sort of causes favoured by major philanthropists.

I thought a couple of other aspects of the report were interesting, although not necessarily relevant to the wider question of the drop in charitable giving. The first is that the majority of million pound donations made this year were given directly to front-line charities, rather than being put into foundations for future distribution. I would be interested to know what lies behind this trend. Perhaps donors recognise the need to get money straight out to beneficiaries in the current climate; perhaps there are many new million pound donors who want to put their money in a ‘a safe pair of hands’ for their first gift of this size; or perhaps it suggests more donors taking a ‘selfless’ approach to philanthropy (in the same way as Warren Buffett when he decided to hand over his philanthropic money to the Gates Foundation to distribute for him).

The other interesting question is what explains the sharp rise in number of million pound donations. The report has always existed with the caveat that it can only capture million pound donations that are identifiable from publicly available sources of information (charity financial reports, media stories etc), so it has never pretended that it was representing all of the £1m+ donations made in a year. The question, then, is: has the number of million pound donations actually increased, or is it just that there is a greater number of identifiable million pound donations? Whichever is the case, there are positives: if it is the former, then there is more money coming into charities,which is clearly good. If it is the latter, then it may suggest that wealthy people are becoming more open about their giving, or that the media are giving more coverage to philanthropy. Both of these would be positive if they strengthened a social norm around charitable giving in the longer term.

The Million Pound Donors report is always worth reading in its own right. However, this year it is particularly interesting because of its relevance to the findings in UK Giving, and the additional insight it gives into what is happening to charitable giving in the UK at the moment. The bottom line is that the situation is tough for many charities, which is why we need wealthy philanthropists, mainstream donors, companies and the Government to come together to Back Britain’s Charities.


BBC interview: Funding shortfall could force some UK charities to shut

Hannah Terrey

Hannah Terrey, CAF’s head of policy and campaigns, explains to BBC News why so many charities are in a difficult financial situation and why Back Britain’s Charities campaign is so important.

You might also want to read the press release behind the news story: One in six charities fear closure as crisis hits, say charity chiefs


Small donations bill – clears final hurdle in House of Commons

Blog post by Charlotte Ravenscroft, Policy Manager at NCVO

Last night, the Small Donations Bill passed its final reading in the House of Commons. Thanks to everyone who has backed this campaign, we were able to secure Government amendments that will make the scheme significantly more accessible to charities. At least 16,000 charities will be better off as a result of these amendments. See our joint press release on the NCVO website for more details.

While not all of our concerns have been addressed, we are glad that the Government has listened to voices from across the sector and responded. As the Scheme gets up and running, we will continue to apply pressure to ensure it reaches as many charities as possible.


Small donations bill – update

Blog post by Karl Wilding, Head of Policy, Research and Foresight at NCVO

It’s good news from the government this morning as we find out what changes they will make to the Small Charitable Donations Bill following our campaigning. The bill sets up a scheme which will allow charities to claim gift aid-style payments on cash donations in collecting tins without the need to get gift aid declarations from donors. As Charlotte set out there were a number of problems with the bill that meant small charities in particular would have struggled to benefit from the scheme.

Under the original proposals, charities would only have been able to claim two times as much small donations aid as they did traditional gift aid. Now the government is proposing that charities be able to claim up to ten times as much small donations aid as they do traditional gift aid. While we’d still like to see the limit on the amount of small donations aid based on how much gift aid is claimed scrapped entirely, this is a significant improvement to the bill and should mean small charities can benefit to a much greater extent.

The government has also listened to us on eligibility for the scheme. Rather than needing a track record of making a gift aid claim for three years before they were able to make a small donations aid claim, charities will now only need to have made a gift aid claim for two years before they are eligible to claim small donations aid. Again, we would rather there were no such requirement, but this is a move in the right direction.

The government has also made provision for the restrictions in the scheme to be altered without the need for further legislation. We hope that once this scheme is established and shown to be working well the restrictions can be further relaxed.

These are very helpful changes to the bill, but they don’t go as far as we would like. It’s very important that the small donations scheme is as simple as possible for even the smallest charities to use. In particular there are some really knotty rules about ‘community buildings’ which most people we speak to simply don’t understand. If you have a moment, please write to or tweet your MP to tell them how much small donations aid could mean to you and direct them to our detailed briefing on the bill. There is more information on taking action here.


Small Donations Bill: Will your charity be able to benefit?

Blog post by Charlotte Ravenscroft, Policy Manager at NCVO

The new Small Donations scheme is supposed to be good news for charities. When it was originally launched by the Chancellor, he said that it would deliver “Gift Aid on the contents of the collecting tin and the street bucket”.

In practice, the Bill does not do quite what it says on the tin. Due to restrictions in the Bill, we are concerned that fewer charities will be able to benefit from the Scheme than the Chancellor originally intended.

Given that the maximum limit per charity is £1,250 (on £5,000 of small donations), we had particularly expected that the Scheme would be of benefit to smaller charities – often those who rely most on collecting tins and street bucket collections. But as it stands, we think these are the charities that will be most likely to lose out.

We have just five days to make a difference – please read on.

So, will your charity be able to benefit from the Small Donations Scheme?

As the Bill stands, there are a number of eligibility restrictions. To use the Scheme, charities will have to:

  • Be registered with HMRC for Gift Aid;
  • Have a three year track-record of using Gift Aid;
  • Claim at least £1 in regular Gift Aid for every £2 they seek to claim through the new Scheme (we’re referring to this as the ‘matching requirement’).

If the charity has a group structure, there are further restrictions. Local groups of a parent charity will only be able to claim if:

  • They operate out of a ‘community building’;
  • Donations are made during the course of their charitable activities within the building, by a group member;
  • While at least 10 people are present, at least six times a year.

While NCVO and other sector bodies recognise HMRC’s priorities to prevent fraud and manage the costs of the Scheme, we feel that many of these restrictions are disproportionate. They will limit the relevance of the Scheme for many of the charities who had hoped to benefit from it.

What can you do?

There are only five days left to take action – the final reading will be in parliament on Monday 26th November.

You can make a difference by contacting your MP today, by email or twitter, and drawing these issues to their attention.

When you contact them, we would suggest that you:

  • Tell them if your charity could be affected by these restrictions;
  • Ask them to back amendments that will make the Scheme more accessible for charities;
  • Send them this parliamentary briefing paper (PDF, 431 KB) that NCVO, CAF, IoF and CFG have published today.

You can use our list to find and contact your MP on Twitter.


Watch our campaign video today

Back Britain’s Charities from KnowHow NonProfit on Vimeo.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 338 other followers

Powered by WordPress.com